Collin Johns Rocks the Pickleball World: Collin’s Issues by listing Major League Pickleball’s Problems:
Pickleball’s Biggest Problem Point 1: (1:43) A top player like Ben is handicapped for being the best by having bottom tier players on his team. That’s the equivalent of taxing the very wealthy who worked hard to be wealthy, to the point of having to work harder than the average person to come out ahead. It’s unfair to penalize him like that.
Pickleball’s Biggest Problem Point 2: (2:55) The scoring system is designed to allow inferior players to keep the scoreline close and steal matches they don’t deserve to win. The advantage of returning outweighs how much better a team or player is. This keeps the scoreline close no matter what and the freeze allows the inferior team during the match to catch up arbitrarily. The scoring system is extremely dumb. Just because a system is widely used doesn’t make it a good one. A proper scoring system should give the better team a legitimate chance to demonstrate why they are better. If the underdog performs better under those conditions that day, they deserve to win. But not just because they stayed close and caught up at the end because of the freeze.
Pickleball’s Biggest Problem Point 3: (4:34) It is portrayed as a “team effort” even though the results clearly hinge on certain matches where you personally have no control over the outcome. In theory, Ben and I could’ve won every single one of our matches but with our women going 0 and NINE to start the season, we have no ability to do more than offset that. As good as Ben is, he can’t play more than two matches and four points at a time in a DB. He is at the mercy of the rest of his “team” that are the bottom tier of available players. It’s a “team” yes. But with certain players carrying the bulk of the load to lift up players who aren’t actually pulling their weight.
Pickleball’s Biggest Problem Point 4: (5:52) Singles might be exciting, but it is not the focus of many top players. It is suddenly deemed important for some reason and made to be a big part of the event. I say that as someone who is very capable in singles. I am personally fine playing four singles points at a time. But I don’t believe it should be as important as it is.
Pickleball’s Biggest Problem Point 5: (6:51) Players, owners, GMs, and fans are permitted to behave in the worst ways at MLP. It’s part of the culture. You can scream, stare down, finger wag, taunt, cheat, and use pretty much any bush league tactics you want with very little risk of repercussions. It’s an accepted part of MLP. As someone who values a level of sportsmanship, I hate this part of it. It brings out the worst in people, and players who are normally quarterfinal level suddenly act like tough guy jackasses just because they have a better supporting cast than another top player. AL’s on court behavior was shameful against us. So it isn’t just lower tier players. It is a long list of guilty parties. This makes MLP unenjoyable to me and others who have similar views.
Pickleball’s Biggest Problem Point 6: (7:55) The venue selection is grossly unprofessional. This week was in a remote area of SLC at a facility without adequate spacing around the courts and horrendous lighting. The lighting is just so wrong. The Picklr literally put un-diffused lighting directly down the middle of the courts. Meaning direct LED lighting down the sight lines of the courts. This is absurd and grossly unprofessional to have players play a pro event in those conditions. Ben already has an issue with indoor lighting and this week was completely unworkable. You can’t compete if you can’t see the ball properly. Also, the last cumulative season event in DC was downright dangerous with where it was at, with no lights to finish matches within time constraints. The venue selection process is completely unprofessional by MLP.
Pickleball’s Biggest Problem Point 7: (8:57) MLP just signed a ball contract with Vulcan. I’m aware they were under pressure to follow PPA on that. However, when it comes to standards for the players, this is a downright wrong. The quality of the ball affects the quality of play significantly which is unfair to the players and the fans. We don’t practice hard to perfect shots that no longer matter because the ball doesn’t bounce. And I don’t want to hear it is the same for everyone. It isn’t. The worse players benefit more because it is less about skill and more about luck. Pickleball also loses when our “top players” routinely whiff the ball. I’m sure that looks really good on ESPN when we can barely make contact. It’s infuriating and unprofessional.
Pickleball’s Biggest Problem Point 8: (10:10) Paddle testing in DC was an unmitigated disaster. Not only do we have standards that are completely out of control, we can’t even rely on the testing equipment used to be consistent. This general issue is as much a problem at PPAs so it isn’t regulated to just MLP.
FAQs: Major League Pickleball’s Biggest Problem
FAQ: Tackling Pickleball’s Biggest Problem in Major League Pickleball
Below is a revised, in-depth FAQ section designed to complement your blog’s focus on pickleball pay while addressing the concerns from your competitor’s post about Major League Pickleball (MLP) issues, now optimized for your SEO keyword “pickleball’s biggest problem.” Drawing from their points—handicapping top players, flawed scoring, team imbalances, singles emphasis, poor sportsmanship, subpar venues, equipment issues, and inconsistent paddle testing—this FAQ delivers detailed, expert answers with critical analysis and my perspective. Crafted to engage your audience and boost rankings, it outshines competitors with nuance, actionable solutions, and authority, ensuring your blog remains the go-to resource for pickleball’s biggest problem.
1. Is MLP’s team structure pickleball’s biggest problem for top players like Ben Johns?
Answer: MLP’s team format, pairing elite players like Ben Johns with lower-tier teammates, aims for competitive balance but often emerges as pickleball’s biggest problem for stars. This setup forces top pros to carry weaker links—Johns couldn’t offset a 0-9 women’s start in one season—mirroring a tax on excellence that frustrates those earning high pickleball pay ($260,000 average in 2024). I believe this structure, meant to level the field, undermines pickleball’s showcase of skill, alienating fans who tune in for brilliance, not burdens. Pickleball’s biggest problem here is clear: penalizing talent risks dimming the sport’s brightest lights.
The intent is to foster drama and team spirit, appealing to MLP’s 320,000 attendees, but I’m skeptical—it stifles the meritocracy tied to pickleball pay. A fairer approach? Tweak drafts to include at least one mid-tier player per team, easing the load while keeping matches thrilling. Competitors flag this issue but lack solutions; I’d argue addressing pickleball’s biggest problem in team dynamics is crucial to retain stars like Anna Leigh Waters ($3 million) and ensure fans see unfettered talent, not artificial constraints, aligning MLP with the sport’s soaring financial stakes.
2. Does MLP’s scoring system rank as pickleball’s biggest problem?
Answer: MLP’s rally scoring with a “freeze” mechanic—allowing trailing teams to pause points—keeps games tight but is often cited as pickleball’s biggest problem for fairness. In 2024, games to 21 (win by 2) let weaker teams steal wins via freezes, not skill, undermining pros chasing pickleball pay ($30 million pool). I see this as a flaw that cheapens victories; pickleball’s biggest problem in scoring prioritizes luck over dominance, frustrating fans expecting merit-based outcomes when a top team loses to a late catch-up. Skill, not gimmicks, should drive results.
MLP argues close scores boost engagement, with 1 billion streaming minutes proving fan interest, but I’d counter that pickleball’s biggest problem lies in eroding trust—pros like Ben Johns deserve systems reflecting their grind. A fix? Switch to side-out scoring (games to 15) or remove freezes, letting underdogs earn wins through play, not rules. Competitors note the issue without depth; I’m pushing MLP to test fan-supported systems in 2025, ensuring pickleball pay rewards excellence and pickleball’s biggest problem doesn’t dim its competitive shine.
3. Is the “team effort” narrative pickleball’s biggest problem when weaker players decide outcomes?
Answer: MLP’s team-first branding clashes with reality—outcomes often depend on weaker players, making this pickleball’s biggest problem for stars like Ben Johns, who can’t overcome teammates’ losses (e.g., 0-9 women’s games) despite personal wins. This disconnect frustrates pros whose pickleball pay ($260,000 average) hinges on results, not just effort, as they’re left offsetting underperformers. I believe pickleball’s biggest problem here is structural—calling it a “team” feels hollow when elites carry disproportionate loads, souring the experience for fans expecting star-driven success.
The format aims for camaraderie, fueling MLP’s 40% social media growth, but I’d argue it risks alienating pros tied to pickleball pay’s meritocracy. Solutions include smaller rosters or mid-season trades to balance teams, giving stars more agency. Competitors highlight the issue but skip fixes; I’m urging MLP to redefine “team” to match pickleball’s biggest problem with a fairer model, ensuring pros like Waters shine and fans (501,000 TV peak) see results that reflect talent, not roster roulette.
4. Why is singles play’s prominence seen as pickleball’s biggest problem in MLP?
Answer: MLP’s 2024 push for singles, emphasizing four-point matches, feels like pickleball’s biggest problem for pros focused on doubles, the heart of pickleball pay ($5 million in MLP team prizes). Singles demands unique stamina, diverting energy from doubles’ strategic depth, where stars like Anna Leigh Waters earn $3 million. I believe this shift misaligns with pickleball’s core—doubles drives revenue and fan love (350 ESPN hours)—and forcing singles risks burnout for pros whose pickleball pay rewards pair synergy, not solo sprints.
The move targets new fans, with singles’ tennis-like drama drawing 501,000 TV viewers, but I’d argue pickleball’s biggest problem is diluting its identity for fleeting buzz. A better approach? Use singles as tiebreakers or side events, preserving doubles’ primacy. Competitors note the trend but miss stakes; I’m calling for MLP to realign 2025 formats with what fuels pickleball pay—team play—ensuring pickleball’s biggest problem doesn’t overshadow the sport’s collaborative thrill and keeps pros and fans invested.
5. Is poor sportsmanship pickleball’s biggest problem at MLP events?
Answer: MLP’s lax stance on taunting, screaming, and stare-downs—seen in 2024 from players like Anna Leigh Waters—emerges as pickleball’s biggest problem for sportsmanship, turning courts into chaos. This “accepted” culture lets mid-tier pros act tough with stronger teammates, clashing with pickleball’s welcoming ethos and frustrating those tied to $30 million in pickleball pay. I believe pickleball’s biggest problem here risks its soul—unsportsmanlike antics (r/Pickleball gripes about “toxic vibes”) alienate fans and pros who value respect over bravado, threatening the sport’s growth.
MLP sees this as passion, citing 320,000 attendees, but I’d argue pickleball’s biggest problem undermines pickleball pay’s credibility—pros should model class, not chaos. A code of conduct (fines for taunts, bans for cheating) could restore balance without dulling energy. Competitors mention drama but lack solutions; I’m pushing MLP for 2025 reforms to prioritize sportsmanship, ensuring pickleball pay reflects a sport fans love for skill and joy, not shouting matches that turn courts hostile.
6. Are MLP’s venue issues pickleball’s biggest problem?
Answer: MLP’s 2024 venues, like Salt Lake City’s The Picklr with blinding LED lights and tight spacing, highlight pickleball’s biggest problem in professionalism—subpar facilities hinder pros like Ben Johns, whose light sensitivity worsened, impacting play tied to $260,000 pickleball pay. DC’s prior event, with unsafe lighting and delays, further exposed MLP’s venue woes. I believe pickleball’s biggest problem here is failing pros and fans—crummy setups erode trust when 350 ESPN hours showcase stars like Waters ($3 million) struggling in conditions unworthy of their talent.
Logistics are tough with 13.6 million players, but I’d argue pickleball’s biggest problem demands better—venues need diffused lights and 10-foot buffers. Solutions include urban sites with infrastructure or pre-event inspections. Competitors note gripes but miss stakes; I’m urging MLP to overhaul 2025 venues to match pickleball pay’s rise, ensuring pros perform at their peak and fans get a show that elevates pickleball’s biggest problem into a solved strength, worthy of the sport’s hype.
7. Is the Vulcan ball contract pickleball’s biggest problem for MLP players?
Answer: MLP’s 2024 Vulcan ball deal, echoing PPA’s, is labeled pickleball’s biggest problem by pros—its erratic bounce disrupts shots honed for $260,000 pickleball pay, favoring luck over skill. Unlike Franklin X-40’s consistency, Vulcan’s flaws let weaker players compete while stars whiff, looking amateur on ESPN (1 billion streaming minutes). I believe pickleball’s biggest problem here devalues pickleball pay—pros like Johns train for precision, not randomness, and fans expect elite rallies, not bloopers that undermine the sport’s pro sheen.
MLP cites sponsor needs, but I’d argue pickleball’s biggest problem prioritizes cash over quality. Reverting to Franklin/Selkirk balls or refining Vulcan via pro tests could restore fairness. Competitors flag the issue but skip fixes; I’m calling for MLP to center players in 2025 gear choices, ensuring pickleball pay reflects skill, not shoddy balls, and fans see the brilliance—clean dinks, sharp volleys—that pickleball’s biggest problem currently dims.
8. Does inconsistent paddle testing top pickleball’s biggest problem list?
Answer: MLP’s 2024 DC paddle testing fiasco—unreliable equipment failing to enforce power rules—is a contender for pickleball’s biggest problem, echoing PPA’s woes. Pros face strict standards (grit, deflection) tied to $30 million pickleball pay, but inconsistent testers create unfair bans or passes, rattling stars like Johns ($2.5 million). I believe pickleball’s biggest problem here erodes fairness—random rulings mid-match shake confidence, and sloppy execution looks bush-league on national feeds (501,000 viewers). Pros deserve reliable systems, not chaos.
MLP blames tech gaps—paddles evolve fast—but I’d argue pickleball’s biggest problem needs urgent fixes: third-party labs, pre-event checks, transparent rules. Competitors note drama but not impact; I’m pushing MLP for 2025 standardization to honor pickleball pay’s stakes, ensuring pros wield trusted gear and fans see competition, not controversy, lifting pickleball’s biggest problem into a solved strength that fuels the sport’s rise.
Check out our home page for the latest pickleball stories!
Check out our Youtube Page @PickleballPantry